I’ve been thinking for a while that I need a pay rise. I don’t want to seem ungrateful to my electorate, and I do realise that my work represents a “calling” rather than a job. But, as a parish councillor, I’ve been having difficulty making my £100 per annum stretch to paying essential household bills.

In order to help any independent pay commission that might be brought in to deal with this issue, I’ve been trying to work out what rate of pay this represents. On average I attend about ten parish council meetings a year; seven meetings of the resources committee; five children’s playing field charity; four village hall charity; two planning; and about ten others that don’t fit any particular category.

So how many is that? 38 meetings for £100. £2.63 a meeting. Most meetings go on for about two and a half hours. I reckon that’s about a pound an hour – for meetings alone. If you consider prep time and answering emails, it’s small change.

I’m being flippant – but there is a serious point to this nonetheless.

As with Westminster MPs, you get what you pay for. Wye is supposed to have 11 councillors but we have had two vacancies for well over a year. The last elections was uncontested. Of the nine that serve, we are all men, and all but three of us are over 60. I’m sure all of my esteemed colleagues will recognize the similarity with Dad’s Army (and the threat from Imperial perhaps makes this comparison especially valid).

I suspect that this is by no means an uncommon scenario – though the National Association of Local Councils confesses to having no data at all on the age and sex of parish councillors nationwide. Neither could they tell me how many vacancies there were at any one time. I think we can assume nevertheless that the vast majority of councillors are 1/ elderly 2/ male. And 3/ that there are indeed a lot of vacancies.

Does this matter? Well, in the era of localism, I think it does. Wye Parish Council has just taken on responsibility for the village green (and of the public loos). We are about to build a Multi Use Games Area and hope to put solar panels on the village hall roof. All that might sound parochial but it involves a lot of work. The small change is getting even smaller.

The money is a token payment of course to pay for photocopying and printer ink. And you couldn’t really do it any other way. Increased payment wouldn’t necessarily attract a better group of councillors. It might not attract more women. There’d be a danger that you’d just attract a lot of people into the parish council who couldn’t do anything else? People who just get in the way?

Public service could be going out of fashion. Time seems more precious than it did in the past. The struggle to make ends meet means that few of us have time for the collective good. As the number of councillors dwindles, the task seems even less attractive to outsiders.

That’s a problem in the era of localism because an increasing workload has to be shared between fewer people.

Undoubtedly we need to make local democracy more attractive and enjoyable. But payment isn’t the way to do it.

About jasperbouverie

I am Jasper Bouverie. I have two blogs: which is about promoting sustainability in the village of Wye in Kent (and beyond); and which I will fill with short films dedicated to promoting social and environmental awareness and change. Find me on Twitter: funderfilms and finelinej
This entry was posted in Governance, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to PAY RISE?

  1. Cate Parish says:

    Jasper–I didn’t realize you get paid in pence for all that you do. Just keeping people informed via this blog is an important public service in my opinion. I will write to my local councillor about it. Joking–I’ll write to my MP. If there’s money sloshing around somewhere to give them a big pay rise they don’t need, it could be diverted to local representatives.

    Perhaps you could start a petition on


    Cate Parish

  2. Hi Cate, thanks for your thoughts! I actually started writing the post thinking that I was going to suggest that some payment would be appropriate – that this would create a demand for people to become parish councillors, and that this would mean that elections would actually be contested and standards would improve. (At least there wouldn’t be any vacancies..) But I actually lost enthusiasm for the idea as I wrote the post – partly because I don’t think £2-3,000 will actually make much difference in pulling in people with the necessary experience and partly because Wye is a special case where there is simply too much to do. My thoughts on the latter are that the government (and local government) let down the community massively when the college closed. We all know about the fiasco around Wye Park – but actually there was another failure – a failure to provide support and visioning to a community that had lost its major employer. The Neighbourhood Plan and the amount of work that the parish council is having to do now is a direct result of that second failure.

Leave a Reply to jasperbouverie Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s